🔥 BitDegree partnered with Ogvio - a free international money transfer service! Sign up now & grab Rewards! 🎁

UK Lords Clash Over Stablecoins’ Role in Future Money System

Key Takeaways

  • The UK's House of Lords debate showed doubts on stablecoins’ future, with experts split on their role in banking and regulation;
  • Giles said stablecoins lack clear UK rules and mostly serve as crypto entry and exit tools, not everyday money;
  • Wilmarth warned that US policies such as the GENIUS Act risk weakening oversight by allowing non-banks to issue dollar tokens.

Stop overpaying - start transferring money with Ogvio. Sign up, invite friends & grab Rewards now! 🎁

UK Lords Clash Over Stablecoins’ Role in Future Money System

The UK’s House of Lords held a session to hear opinions on stablecoins as part of a new inquiry into how they should be managed under national rules.

During the session, members of the Financial Services Regulation Committee (FSRC) questioned two experts with very different opinions: Financial Times economics writer Chris Giles and US law professor Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.

They discussed how stablecoins might compete with banks, their role in cross-border payments, the risks of criminal use, and how US policies, such as the GENIUS Act, compare.

What is Crypto Arbitrage? (Risks & Tips Explained With Animation)

Did you know?

Want to get smarter & wealthier with crypto?

Subscribe - We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!

Wilmarth argued that stablecoins should not be viewed as a natural part of the financial system. In his view, the GENIUS Act is a “terrible” idea because it lets non-banks issue stablecoins tied to the US dollar.

He described this as a “regulatory loophole” that allows new players to enter the money market without strong oversight.

Giles focused on why stablecoins have not become popular in the UK. He said there is still no clear legal framework, so people hesitate to treat them as real money.

According to Giles, most current stablecoin use is to move money in and out of crypto. He described them as mainly “on- and off-ramps” for digital assets that are “not massively interesting or going to take over the world".

When asked whether stablecoins should pay interest, he said it depends on their purpose. If they are only a way to send money, then there is “no need to pay interest".

White House officials recently met with crypto and banking groups to discuss stablecoin yields and the CLARITY Act. What did they say? Read the full story.

Aaron S. Editor-In-Chief
Having completed a Master’s degree in Economics, Politics, and Cultures of the East Asia region, Aaron has written scientific papers analyzing the differences between Western and Collective forms of capitalism in the post-World War II era.
With close to a decade of experience in the FinTech industry, Aaron understands all of the biggest issues and struggles that crypto enthusiasts face. He’s a passionate analyst who is concerned with data-driven and fact-based content, as well as that which speaks to both Web3 natives and industry newcomers.
Aaron is the go-to person for everything and anything related to digital currencies. With a huge passion for blockchain & Web3 education, Aaron strives to transform the space as we know it, and make it more approachable to complete beginners.
Aaron has been quoted by multiple established outlets, and is a published author himself. Even during his free time, he enjoys researching the market trends, and looking for the next supernova.

Loading...
binance
×
Verified

ZERO FEES

For Ogvio Money Transfers
Rating
5.0