MIT Brothers Fight to Block Google History in Crypto Trial

MIT Brothers Fight to Keep Google Searches Out of $25 Million Crypto Trial

Written by Aaron S.,

Editor-In-Chief

Last Updated: August 26, 2025

Key Takeaways

Anton and James Peraire-Bueno asked a judge to block prosecutors from using their Google searches as evidence in the $25 million crypto case;
The defense said the queries, including "top crypto lawyers", were tied to legal consultations, not proof of intent in the Ethereum exploit;
Prosecutors accused the brothers of exploiting Ethereum’s MEV-boost to steal $25 million, and each faces up to 20 years for fraud and money laundering.

Ace quick missions & earn crypto rewards while gaining real-world Web3 skills. Participate Now! 🔥

BITDEGREE IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

Anton and James Peraire-Bueno are asking a Manhattan court to stop prosecutors from using their Google search activity in an upcoming trial.

In a motion filed on August 22, they said the queries were made while speaking with lawyers and should not be treated as evidence of intent. Among the searches highlighted are phrases like "top crypto lawyers" and "wire fraud statute of limitations".

The dispute leaves Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke to decide whether these searches represent signs of guilt or if they were simply part of getting legal guidance after investigators became involved.

What is IOTA's Tangle? IOTA & mIOTA Animated Explainer

Did you know?

Want to get smarter & wealthier with crypto?

Subscribe - We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!

The case dates back to April 2023, when the brothers allegedly exploited Ethereum’s ETH $4,446.97 MEV-boost system. Authorities said they intercepted private trades and moved about $25 million in less than 15 seconds.

The following year, prosecutors charged them with conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years.

According to filings, the two began looking for legal help after being "threatened by anonymous sandwich attackers", who demanded the return of the money. Their lawyers argued that privilege logs show a direct overlap between searches and attorney communications.

Defense attorneys argued that prosecutors cannot prove the searches relate directly to the alleged theft. They also pointed out that no witnesses can explain the context. The brothers said:

The contents of the searches themselves do not show that.

Recently, Thai police detained a 33-year-old South Korean man suspected of converting cryptocurrencies into gold for a call center network. How did the case unfold? Read the full story.