Stop overpaying - start transferring money with Ogvio. Sign up, invite friends & grab Rewards now! 🎁
Is Bitcoin going to $40K? This analyst thinks so
|
Plus: JPMorgan launching a tokenized money market fund on Ethereum Today's newsletter is brought to you by |
The market feels like that moment right after a big laugh dies down and everyone looks around to see who's about to say something. Bitcoin's still trading in the $80K-$90K range (pretty ok), but it's also ~30% off the ~$126K peak it reached in early October (... not pretty ok). This combo does something to people's confidence. And Luke Gromen showed up to say the quiet part out loud. Gromen's a macro analyst who's spent years saying some version of: governments print = currencies weaken = hard assets win. Bitcoin has always been in that bucket for him, as a macro hedge. But recently, instead of talking about Bitcoin as an obvious beneficiary right now, Gromen talked about vulnerability. He thinks BTC could slide into the $40K range by 2026. From $80K+, that's a 50% drop, which is kind of on-brand for Bitcoin… but still chilling when said out loud.
His logic: If Bitcoin is supposed to be the cleanest debasement trade, why is gold doing the job better rn? Gold's been ripping to new highs this year while BTC's been chopping sideways and struggling to assert itself above key technical levels. That relative underperformance matters in macro. Capital doesn't care about your thesis - it cares about execution. And lately, Bitcoin's been telling a less convincing story than the shiny rock. (I know. Annoying.)
He also touched on something that's been resurfacing in market conversations: quantum computing risk. Most cryptography experts continue to frame this as a long-dated, theoretical issue, not an imminent threat. But markets don't require immediacy for a narrative to have impact. The presence of an additional uncertainty - even a distant one - can influence behavior at the margin. Sometimes it doesn't trigger selling, but it does reduce enthusiasm.
Now, some Bitcoin analysts don't agree with Gromen. They argue that: 👉 Lagging gold for a few months doesn't invalidate the long-term thesis; 👉 Technicals aren't destiny; 👉 And quantum risk is being overstated. All fair points. Put together, the picture isn't bearish or bullish. It's transitional. Bitcoin remains high-priced, widely held, and structurally intact. At the same time, the market is testing how much conviction actually exists at these levels without a fresh catalyst. That tension explains the current feel: calm on the surface, cautious underneath.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
















