🚨 Time is Running Out: Reserve Your Spot in the Lucky Draw & Claim Rewards! START NOW
Learn to gain real rewards

Learn to gain real rewards

Collect Bits, boost your Degree and gain actual rewards!

New
Video Courses
Video Courses
Deprecated
Scale your career with online video courses. Dive into your learning adventure!

Class-Action Suit Against Uniswap Dismissed Based On the Nature of Blockchain

Class-Action Suit Against Uniswap Dismissed Based On the Nature of Blockchain

Uniswap scored a legal victory while the court classified ETH as a commodity.

A class-action suit between Uniswap Labs and its CEO Hayden Z. Adams and plaintiffs over the money users lost to scam tokens on the exchange has been dismissed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla.

According to the court documents, the plaintiffs claimed that they invested in what turned out to be scam tokens that were issued and traded on Uniswap. However, the Judge dismissed the complaint, stating there’s no identifiable defendant and Uniswap cannot be held liable as a stand-in.

Bullish vs Bearish Markets: How to Predict it? (Animated)

Did you know?

Want to get smarter & wealthier with crypto?

Subscribe - We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!

Bullish vs Bearish Markets: How to Predict it? (Animated)

Bullish vs Bearish Markets: How to Predict it? (Animated) Bullish vs Bearish Markets: How to Predict it? (Animated)

She noted that:

Due to the Protocol’s decentralized nature, the identities of the Scam Token issuers are basically unknown and unknowable, leaving Plaintiffs with an identifiable injury but no identifiable defendant.

The complaint was filed in 2022 with 6 lead plaintiffs, who are represented individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants “have contributed millions of dollars’ worth of tokens to liquidity pools on the Protocol, thus enriching themselves to the tune of millions of dollars” at the expense of the users.

The complaint also claims that Unisawp holds 88% of the total amount of UNI tokens, which provides disproportionate control over the governance of the exchange.

Additionally, the judge explained that the dismissal is party based on the fact that plaintiffs hoped to sue defendants since the current state of crypto regulations “leaves them without recourse.”

What made waves among crypto enthusiasts is the fact this dismissal clearly classified Ethereum and Bitcoin as “crypto commodities.” This distinction comes at a crucial time when regulators can’t seem to properly define digital assets, with some seeking to identify them as securities.

Judge Failla is also the one overseeing the SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase over alleged law violations.

Aaron S., Editor-In-Chief
Having completed a Master’s degree in Economics, Politics, and Cultures of the East Asia region, Aaron has written scientific papers analyzing the differences between Western and Collective forms of capitalism in the post-World War II era.
With close to a decade of experience in the FinTech industry, Aaron understands all of the biggest issues and struggles that crypto enthusiasts face. He’s a passionate analyst who is concerned with data-driven and fact-based content, as well as that which speaks to both Web3 natives and industry newcomers.
Aaron is the go-to person for everything and anything related to digital currencies. With a huge passion for blockchain & Web3 education, Aaron strives to transform the space as we know it, and make it more approachable to complete beginners.
Aaron has been quoted by multiple established outlets, and is a published author himself. Even during his free time, he enjoys researching the market trends, and looking for the next supernova.

Loading...
binance
×
Verified

$600 WELCOME BONUS

Earn Huge Exclusive Binance Learners Rewards
Rating