Terra Classic vs Polygon - Briefly Compare Crypto
To showcase the LUNC vs MATIC comparison as precisely as possible, we've organized our data-driven findings into four clear categories. For a quick snapshot of the core metrics, see the cryptocurrency comparison chart below with a side-by-side view of Polygon vs Terra Classic.
Comparing the ranking, it's evident that Polygon is in the lead with an overall ranking of #116, while Terra Classic follows at #131. When it comes to the price, Polygon currently trades above Terra Classic, underscoring its larger market valuation. As for the 30-day price change, Polygon moved 19.07%, while Terra Classic registered 1.58%.
To give your analysis a firmer footing, we've set Polygon VS Terra Classic against the highest-ranking crypto overall – Bitcoin. With a current price of $0.2543 and a 30-day change of -6.89%, it sets a clear benchmark for performance and adoption. For a detailed, metric-by-metric view of how Polygon vs Terra Classic stack up, check the comprehensive crypto comparison below.
Compare Other Cryptocurrencies
BITCOIN
BTC
|
POLYGON
MATIC
|
TERRA CLASSIC
LUNC
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #116 | #131 | |
| Coin | Coin | Coin | |
|
$108,591.00
5.15%
|
$0.2543
2.59%
|
$0.0000583
5.49%
|
|
| 6.89% | 19.07% | 1.58% | |
| $931.10 6.89% | $1,190.70 19.07% | $984.20 1.58% | |
| $1,836.46 83.65% | $581.11 41.89% | $705.04 29.50% | |
| $4,159.09 315.91% | $452.75 54.72% | $930.43 6.96% | |
|
Today
$108,591.00
89.24%
|
2024
$59,130.60
126.47%
|
2023
$26,109.31
28.63%
|
2022
$20,297.99
|
Today
$0.2543
43.39%
|
2024
$0.4376
22.09%
|
2023
$0.5617
31.28%
|
2022
$0.8174
|
Today
$0.0000583
26.97%
|
2024
$0.0000827
31.97%
|
2023
$0.0000627
52.35%
|
2022
$0.0001
|
|
| Bitcoin (BTC) is the staple of the whole crypto world. |
Polygon, formerly known as the Matic Network, serves as both an Ethereum Layer 2 solution and a cryptocurrency.
Polygon is an intuitive Plasma-based sidechain solution running alongside the Ethereum network. |
LUNC (previously known as LUNA) is the original native token of the Terra chain. | |
| Buy/Sell BTC See Full BTC Analysis | Buy/Sell MATIC See Full MATIC Analysis | Buy/Sell LUNC See Full LUNC Analysis |
A Detailed Crypto Comparison of Polygon vs Terra Classic
Unpack every vital stat with this extensive MATIC vs LUNC comparison chart. From the key metrics to utility and social activity data, compare crypto charts and market caps in a single view to settle your coin-selection debate.
Compare Other Cryptocurrencies
|
BITCOIN
BTC
|
POLYGON
MATIC
|
TERRA CLASSIC
LUNC
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Medium of Exchange | Blockchain | DeFi | |
| $2.16T 0.34% | $401,763,877 7.05% | $321,037,817 1.24% | |
|
19.91M
/ 21M BTC
94.83%
|
--
∞
|
5.5T
/ ∞ LUNC
∞
|
|
|
$123,785.10
12.27%
(Aug 14, 2025)
|
$2.92
91.30%
(Dec 27, 2021)
|
$119.18
100.00%
(Apr 05, 2022)
|
|
|
$65.53
165,622.00%
(Jul 05, 2013)
|
$0.0030
8,344.72%
(May 09, 2019)
|
$0.0000168
248.15%
(May 13, 2022)
|
|
| BTC/USDT BTC/USDT BTC/USDT | MATIC/USD MATIC/BTC MATIC/EUR | LUNC/USDT LUNC/USDT LUNC/USDT | |
| $12,154,677,395 | $946,635 | $4,193,688 | |
Main Specs |
|||
| $2.28T 0.34% | $2,543,167,387 7.05% | $378,588,047 1.24% | |
| 56.99% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
| Proof-of-Work (PoW) | Polygon Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PolyBFT) | proof-of-stake | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bitcoin | Ethereum | Terra | |
| - | ERC-20 | ERC-20 | |
| Store of Value | Utility, Governance | - | |
|
|
|
|
| All Changelly Coupons | All Changelly Coupons | All Changelly Coupons | |
Company's Info |
|||
| 2009 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| Satoshi Nakamoto | Sandeep Nailwal, Jaynti Kanani, Anurag Arjun | Daniel Shin and Do Kwon | |
| - |
|
|
|
Community Info |
|||
|
0.15%
|
0.01%
|
0.06%
|
|
| - | |||
| -- | |||
| Buy/Sell BTC See Full BTC Analysis | Buy/Sell MATIC See Full MATIC Analysis | Buy/Sell LUNC See Full LUNC Analysis | |
Terra Classic vs Polygon Comparison Result Analysis
Market cap is the usual starting point when you compare crypto assets. Polygon leads with a valuation of $401.76M, surpassing Terra Classic at $321.03M; this edge signifies a broader presence in the overall crypto economy. Supply tells the next part of the story: Polygon has 0 MATIC in circulation out of MATIC, whereas Terra Classic has 5.5T LUNC out of 6.4T LUNC – figures that hint at future inflation pressure or scarcity potential.
Furthermore, a 24-hour turnover of $4.19M places Terra Classic ahead of Polygon at $946.63K, typically translating to tighter spreads and smoother trade execution. The larger dominance share, at 0.01% for Polygon, confirms broader market influence even when volumes fluctuate.
Community reach matters, too. Polygon has 2.07M X followers, while Terra Classic records 965.53K followers. The asset with the bigger crowd – Polygon – might benefit from greater visibility and faster feedback loops, which could attract developers and, over time, increase liquidity.
Functionality-wise, Polygon sits in the Blockchain niche on the following blockchains: Ethereum. It trades most actively on Kraken, and is typically stored in Ledger Flex. Moreover, Terra Classic serves the DeFi sector across the following networks: Terra. It has peak liquidity on Kraken and preferred custody in Ledger Flex. Together, these metrics outline not just size and activity but also ecosystem fit, helping you align each coin with your strategy and risk tolerance.
Summary
This thorough Polygon vs Terra Classic comparison places Polygon ahead on most evaluative points, signaling greater market strength today.
When stacked against the market heavyweight Polygon, however, both assets trail its superior dominance, long-term outlook, and overall adoption, underscoring the wider institutional confidence the leader has already secured.
Bitcoin (BTC) is the staple of the whole crypto world. The aim of developing Bitcoin was to create a digital currency that would work in a peer-to-peer manner and would be independent of any third-party financial institutions or middlemen. The creation of the Bitcoin token was the catalyst that, in the years to come, would result in the inception of decentralized finance. Besides, the BTC token serves as the basis for the creation of a huge variety of other cryptocurrencies.
How Is This Terra Classic vs Polygon Comparison Created?
1. We Collect
The figures in this LUNC vs MATIC cryptocurrency comparison come from audited exchange APIs, blockchain explorers, and verified social media counts. Pulling only trusted, time-stamped data ensures that every market cap, volume digit, or follower number you read is rooted in fact, not rumor.
2. We Examine
Our analysts run the raw feeds through data-science filters – removing duplicates, flagging anomalies, and cross-checking outliers against multiple sources. Price history, supply stats, and community metrics all pass the same scrutiny, weeding out hype and unverified claims before anything reaches the chart.
3. We Score
To make the MATIC vs LUNC crypto comparison easy to digest, each core metric is turned into a clear score or percentile bar and compared side by side. Whether it’s market dominance, volume, or social traction, the visual grading lets you weigh strengths and weaknesses at a glance without needing to find each number yourself.
4. You Choose
Once the facts are compiled, scored, and displayed, the decision is yours. Browse the comprehensive Polygon vs Terra Classic comparison chart, align the insights with your risk profile and investment horizon, and pick the asset (or mix of assets) that best matches your goals. Just never invest more than you can afford to lose!
FAQ
Which metrics matter most in this Polygon vs Terra Classic crypto comparison?
To compare crypto efficiently, whether it be MATIC vs LUNC or any other assets, start with the basics: live price, market cap, and 24h volume – these reveal size and day-to-day liquidity. Next, compare market cap crypto numbers against circulating and total supply to analyze scarcity. Layer in utility and community figures (X followers, etc.) for long-term potential. Eventually, accessibility matters as well – check what the top exchanges are to get the assets in question.
Where to buy Polygon and Terra Classic?
If you’ve decided to go with Polygon after comparing MATIC vs LUNC, the most recommended exchange to buy it is Kraken. On the other hand, if Terra Classic is your pick, you can get it on Kraken. To select the most cost-efficient option, do a quick crypto fees comparison on maker-taker rates and withdrawal costs.
How to compare assets with this Crypto Comparison Tool?
Start by selecting any two coins or tokens in the drop-down menu, then tap "Compare Now". The tool will load an instant overview (live price, 30-day returns, rank, historical price changes, etc.) so you can compare crypto performance in seconds. Scroll for the full cryptocurrency analysis chart to compare crypto market caps, supply, trading volume, social signals, and find trusted exchanges to buy the assets, among other things.
Why should I care about 24-hour volume when comparing LUNC vs MATIC?
If Terra Classic has a 24-hour volume of $4.19M while Polygon sees $946.63K, the higher-turnover asset usually offers tighter spreads, faster fills, and lower slippage, which are crucial for larger orders. That said, when you compare crypto momentum, always pair price action with volume – thin books can make exits slower and costlier, regardless of upside potential.
Why is the fully diluted market cap important in a crypto comparison?
Market cap shows today’s valuation, but fully diluted market cap projects value if every possible unit enters circulation. Comparing the two figures reveals potential inflation pressure or scarcity upside. A large gap warns that future token unlocks could weigh on price, while a small gap suggests limited new supply. Always view both numbers when you compare crypto market caps.
What’s the difference between a coin and a token?
Coins like Bitcoin have their own blockchains and native consensus rules, while tokens like USDT ride on existing chains through smart contract standards like ERC-20. That choice influences fees, security assumptions, governance, and upgrade speed. When comparing crypto, noting coin-versus-token architecture helps you weigh network independence against convenience and decide which technical profile matches your strategy.
